THE FUNCTION OF MEMORY AND HISTORY IN POSTCOLONIAL LITERATURE

Main Article Content

Dilrabo Ibrokhimova
Mavluda Komiljonova

Abstract

Postcolonial literature often grapples with the complex interplay between memory and history, presenting them as central themes in articulating the experiences of colonization and its aftermath. Memory serves as a personal and collective tool for reclaiming identity, while history is reexamined to challenge dominant colonial narratives. This article explores how postcolonial writers use memory and history to resist cultural erasure, reconstruct silenced voices, and negotiate identity in postcolonial societies. Through examples from key texts, it highlights how these concepts serve as mechanisms for healing, resistance, and empowerment.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ibrokhimova, D., & Komiljonova, M. (2024). THE FUNCTION OF MEMORY AND HISTORY IN POSTCOLONIAL LITERATURE. GOLDEN BRAIN, 2(22), 41-43. https://webgoldenbrain.com/index.php/gb/article/view/667
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Ibrokhimova, D., & Komiljonova, M. (2024). THE FUNCTION OF MEMORY AND HISTORY IN POSTCOLONIAL LITERATURE. GOLDEN BRAIN, 2(22), 41-43. https://webgoldenbrain.com/index.php/gb/article/view/667

References

Achebe, C. (1958). Things Fall Apart. Heinemann.

Morrison, T. (1987). Beloved. Alfred A. Knopf.

Rushdie, S. (1981). Midnight’s Children. Jonathan Cape.

Ghosh, A. (2000). The Glass Palace. HarperCollins.

Ngũgĩ wa Thiong‘o. (1967). A Grain of Wheat. Heinemann.

Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.

Fanon, F. (1961). The Wretched of the Earth. Grove Press.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.